Blockchain forensics: evidence and limitations
Public-ledger analysis can help describe asset movements. It is important to distinguish an observable transaction from a conclusion about a person or recoverable funds.
Read morePublic-ledger analysis can help describe asset movements. It is important to distinguish an observable transaction from a conclusion about a person or recoverable funds.
Read moreStart with affected accounts and a clear incident record. Identity restoration often involves several organizations and separate verification processes.
Read moreA familiar-looking invoice or email can carry fraudulent payment instructions. Consistent verification is more reliable than trusting appearance or urgency.
Read moreClaims of dependable high returns with little risk should be examined carefully. A professional presentation does not establish that an investment is legitimate.
Read moreA relationship that becomes a source of pressure, secrecy, or repeated payment requests deserves a pause. Financial manipulation can happen to anyone.
Read moreFocus first on limiting further exposure and preserving reliable evidence. An urgent promise of recovery is not a substitute for a careful response.
Read morePeople who have already experienced fraud are sometimes targeted again by someone offering a guaranteed recovery. Pause before paying or sharing information.
Read moreA blockchain record may help explain where a transfer went. It is evidence, not a mechanism for reversing the payment.
Read moreA calm, organized response can help protect the evidence and prevent additional losses. Start with the institutions that can take immediate action.
Read more